How Power Affects Moral Judgments

Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Power
1.1.1 What is Power
1.1.2 Methods and Measures in Power
Research
1.1.3 Theories of Power
1.1.4 Consequences of Power
1.1.5 Power and Morality
1.1.6 Summary and Outlook
1.2 Moral Judgments
1.2.1 Deontology and Utilitarianism
1.2.2 Moral Dilemmas
1.2.3 Intuitionist and Rationalist Models
1.2.4 Influencing Factors in Moral
Judgments
1.2.5 Summary and Outlook
1.3 Power and Moral Judgments
1.3.1 Aims of the Current Studies
1.3.2 Power and Moral Judgments in
Different Contexts
1.3.3 The Role of Cognitive Processing
Style
1.3.4 The Role of Goal Focus
1.3.5 Summary and Outlook
1.4 Present Research
1.4.1 Is the Association Between Power and
Moral Judgments Generalisable
1.4.2 How Does the Presence of Harm Modify
the Association Between Power and
Moral Thinking Style
1.4.3 What Is the Role of Processing Style
on the Links Between Power and
Moral Judgments
1.4.4 Understanding the Link Between
Power and Moral Judgments With
the Situated Theory of Power-the
Role of Goals Focus
Chapter 2 The Replications And Extensions Of Previous
Findings About Power And Moral
Judgments
2.1 Replication of Previous Findings
2.1.1 Overview
2.1.2 Study 1: Replication Study of
Lammers and Stapel (2009)
2.1.3 Study 2: Power and Moral Judgments
in an Organisational Environment
2.1.4 Summary and Outlook
2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association Between
Power and Moral Thinking Style
2.2.1 Overviews
2.2.2 Study 3: Moral Reasoning in the
Presence of Harm
2.2.3 Study 4: Moral Reasoning in the
Presence of Impersonal Harm
2.2.4 Summary and outlook
Chapter 3 Power,Cognitive Processing Style and Moral
Judgments
3.1 Overview
3.2 Study 5:Cognitive Load Increases the
Preference for Deontology of the
Powerless
3.3 Study 6:Deliberative Thinking Increases
Utilitarian Judgments Among the
Powerful
3.4 Summary and Outlook
Chapter 4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility Via Focal
Goal Commitment
4.1 Overviews
4.2 Study 7:Goal Focus Modifies How Power
Affects Moral Judgments
4.3 Study 8: How Power Affects Moral
Judgments with Personal Chronic
Goals
4.4 Study 9: Power Increases Deontological
Judgments via the Chronic Goal of
Maintaining Authority
4.5 Study 10: The Mediating Role of Goal
Commitment
4.6 Summary and Outlook
Chapter 5 General Discussion
5.1 Overview
5.2 Summary of the Present Research
5.2.1 Replication
5.2.2 How Harm Modifies the Association
Between Power and Moral
Judgments
5.2.3 Power, Cognitive Processing Style
and Moral Judgments
5.2.4 Power Increases Moral Flexibility via
Goal Focus
5.2.5 Experimental Design
5.2.6 Effect Size
5.3 Implications of the Present Findings
5.3.1 Power and Moral Thinking Style
5.3.2 Theories and Research of Power
5.3.3 Theories of Moral Judgments
5.3.4 Applied Implications
5.4 Limitations
5.4.1 Boundary Conditions for Power
Differences in Moral Judgments
5.4.2 Further Study About the Role of
Cognitive Processing Style
5.4.3 Goal Focus
5.4.4 The Utilitarian Judgments of the
Powerless
5.4.5 Manipulation of Power
5.5 Conclusion
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Appendix 3
Appendix 4
Appendix 5
Appendix 6
Appendix 7
References